European Union Might Respond to ‘Unwarranted’ US Travel Restrictions, Spokesperson States
The European Union might “act quickly and firmly” against what it calls “unwarranted” travel bans issued by the US on five Europeans working on fighting online hate and misinformation, a European Commission spokesperson has said.
EU Officials Decry US Move as ‘Intimidation’
European leaders including Emmanuel Macron accused Washington of “bullying and threats”, following the visa restrictions targeted figures who have been central to campaigns to introduce legislation governing US-based technology firms.
“For far too long, European activists have led organised efforts to coerce American platforms to suppress US perspectives they disagree with,” wrote the US secretary of state online. “The current administration will not stand for these egregious acts of censorship beyond its borders.”
Widespread Condemnation Across Europe
Germany, Spain, the UK and a chorus of EU officials joined France in condemning the move.
The restrictions were enacted this week against a former EU commissioner who helped draft the bloc’s Digital Services Act (DSA), along with several anti-disinformation campaigners, including Germany and the United Kingdom.
An Escalating Conflict Over Regulation
The DSA is seen by US officials as a type of speech restriction, whereas EU authorities argue the regulations are necessary to combat hate speech and falsehoods.
This row risks becoming part of a far wider ongoing political and ideological clash between Washington and Europe.
Additional Updates Reported Today
In related legal news:
- A federal judge has halted attempts to cut security grants to local governments which resist specific federal immigration rules. The judge stated the action was “another example” of tying federal aid to adherence to directives.
- Approval was given for the dispatch of 350 national guard members to a major US city ahead of the holiday period, coinciding with an active immigration enforcement operation.
- A Pacific Island nation will consent to take in a limited number of migrants from the US in exchange for additional aid, following signing a formal agreement with Washington.
Furthermore, a Democratic lawmaker has filed a lawsuit to demand the removal of the current president’s name from a prominent cultural institution in Washington DC.
Experts point out that comments regarding foreign petroleum resources reflect a wider ideology in some quarters of “resource imperialism”, drawing comparisons with past foreign policy strategies.